How do you define culture?
Culture is what a population of people believes, thinks, and practices; combined with individual experiences and ideas.
What makes up a persons culture?
A person's experiences, beliefs, achievements, failures, and genes make up his/her particular culture.
Is culture intrinsic or extrinsic?Explain
A person's culture is a mixture of both outside factors and innate behaviors. Although the intrinsic part plays a bigger part of someone's life when they are younger, it still plays a vital part when they get older. Finally A person's intrinsic instincts help to shape a persons extrinsic experience. In the end both play a vital role in developing ones culture.
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Sunday, August 19, 2012
The Runaway
Jack Humphries
8/17/12
Fact
1. The boy's shirt is yellow
2. The man and the boy are sitting
3. The sign reads "specials today"
Claim
1. The little boy has ran away from home.
2. The man next to him is scolding him for running away
3. The painting is set in a restaurant a long time ago
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Dreams Gone and The Ending
In the back half of Stienbeck’s intriguing
novel the Pearl we see Kino’s desperation for a better life destroy most of
what he had. His wife tries to throw the pearl back into the ocean in order to
save Kino from his paranoia. He follows her and throws her to the ground. He
then tries to return home but is attacked by a man. He kills him and runs to
flee with his family in his canoe. As he nears the ocean he finds his canoe
broken and so he travels back to the village. Here he finds his house burned.
He and his wife flee to Kino’s brother’s house for safety. Stienbeck’s dark
turn only reinforces his anti-capitalistic views, showing readers how much
better Kino’s life would have been without his dreams of the pearl.
In the end Kino’s acceptance of wealth’s evil
is brought on by the loss of his son. The bitter sweet ending Stienbeck gives
his audience only strengthens the tune he had played throughout the novel. That
tune being that misfortune follows those dreaming of wealth. I also recognized
Stienbeck’s condemnation towards Kino’s ancestors who had “dreamt of having
more” by sending someone to the capitol to sell pearls for them. Stienbeck
punishes Kino’s ancestors by writing that after two times of sending merchants
to the capitol neither returned, after which the pearlers gave up their dreams.
Stienbeck’s repeated situations that support his tune give structure to his
somewhat communistic beliefs but in the end he blends morals with plot to
create a wonderful book.
Human Dreams and Mysterious Songs
Stienbeck’s novel the Pearl begins with the
main character Kino awakening. Kino is a Mexican peasant who looks for pearls
in oysters. As his wife wakes up and starts making breakfast, he enjoys his
“family song”. He soon hears the “song of evil” as he puts it; a scorpion is
crawling toward their son Coyotito. Kino tries to reach his son in time but is
to late. I wonder why Stienbeck uses the ideas of songs so much. He makes his
novel about poverty sound like a musical. Maybe he is trying to show how routine
and pleasant Kino’s life is at the beginning of the story. It is also possible that by using songs
that Steinbeck is showing how simple life for Kino is.
Next, Kino takes his son to a wealthy
doctor. The doctor is discontent
with every aspect of his life, and when Kino asks for the doctor’s help and
receives none (because he is poor). Kino then goes pearling in hopes to find a
pearl. As he dives into the sea he hears the song of hope and the song of the
pearl. Through Stienbeck’s use of song we see how important this part of the
book is so that when Kino finds “ The pearl of the world” we as an audience can
better understand why he’s happy. As Kino sees his pearl he starts dreaming of
a better world for his son. With his discovery Kino becomes discontent with his
life of poverty though.
Upon Kino’s discovery news spreads through
the town and the doctor goes to see Kino’s son. The doctor gives Coyotito a
strange white power and claims “ the evil went within”. He also declares it
will soon return. He also tricks Kino into looking towards the corner where he
hid his pearl. Later Kino awakes to find a stranger rummaging through his
house. Kino stabs the intruder and waits until the morning. At this point it’s
apparent that Stienbeck is using his novel to preach his views on wealth. He
paints Kino’s pre-pear life as pleasant and the rich doctor’s life as
miserable. Finally Kino dreams of how money will make him happy.
The Pygmalion Ends
In
the last half of the Pygmalion I was befuddled by the conversation between
Eliza and Higgins. In this volley of dialogue the reader gets the sense that
Eliza and Higgins are both infatuated and disgusted by one another. Shaw
explains their confusing situation perfectly in the sequel, and then shortly
wraps up the book by stating “Galatea never does quite like the Pygmalion; His
relationship with her is too godlike to be altogether agreeable”. This short
and sweet ending gives an allusion to the original story of the Pygmalion and
also leaves the reader thinking.
At
first my thoughts were to disagree with this statement all together because
unlike Galatea, Higgins did like his “Pygmalion”. Then I realized that though
he may like her, he would feel awkward around his creation because he would
feel like he had power over her. We even know Eliza resents him because he
holds power over her and in the end that’s why she marries Freddy. The type of
relationship she has with Higgins even now leads to Eliza and Higgins wrestling
for control.
Finally I was amused at Clara’s and Mr.
Doolittle’s troubles of adapting to her/her new class, this showed the
confusion of change and in a way exemplified a conversation Higgins had with
the Colonel. The conversation where Higgins states that the upper class “Don’t
even know their own game”, in this case both Clara and Mr. Doolittle struggle
to learn a new “game”. For both of them it is difficult to adjust but by the
end of his play Shaw has placed everybody perfectly, making his masterpiece the
Pygmalion complete.
The Creation of Pygmalion
Pygmalion
In
the beginning one could hardly think that the lowly flower girl we see bumbling
and Ah-owing would become as classy as duchess. Her proposed transformation
brought on by a snide comment made by Henry Higgins, is achieved through
phonetics. In a key chaotic point in the story Eliza Doolittle enters
Pickering’s house demanding to be taught to speak like royalty. I found this
part extremely interesting due to the anarchy that breaks out as Higgins and
Pickering debate how they should go about training Eliza. All the while Eliza
is arguing with herself whether she should leave or stay.
Through
much conflict Eliza is made a permanent resident to the Perkins house. I
thought this part of the book was particularly funny because of Eliza’s
confusion, in the end she’s persuaded to stay in return for chocolates. This
childish action amuses me because in order to make Eliza more mature and
refined Higgins and Pickering had to childishly bribe her with sweets.
As
Eliza progresses in her training Higgins shows her off to his mom, and some
others. Among them is Freddy a young man who becomes infatuated in Eliza while
at the gathering. He is asks by Higgins if he would like to see her again and
he response most certainly.
Finally
the biggest event in this first half of the Pygmalion is at the dinner party
where Nepommuck, a world-renowned translator and Phonetics analyst, diagnoses
Eliza as Hungarian Royalty. Higgins scoffs at this theory and exposes her true
origins. No one believes him though and he is laughed at by some of the
dignitaries at the dinner party. After this exchange they leave the dinner
party and head home to discuss how Higgins had “won his bet”. At this point I’m
happy for Higgins’s accomplishment but I’m sad that Eliza’s story seems to be
done.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)